Cases 21 - 30 of 93
JOHNSON v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2017cv02112
Plaintiff:
DON JOHNSON
Defendant:
CARNEY, JOHN DOE and CARNEY FOR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2017cv00282
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry Don Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. DIX et al
as 2:2016cv06653
Plaintiff:
DON JOHNSON
Defendant:
DIX, BRADLEY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2016cv01067
Petitioner:
Russell Don Johnson
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wing C. Chan v. United States et al.
as 2:2016cv08528
Petitioner:
Wing C Chan
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Don Johnson and United States
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv02133
Plaintiff:
GARLAND E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, STATE OF KANSAS, JACOB LEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Don Johnson Hayward Motors Inc et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Don Johnson Hayward Motors Inc , Gross Motors Inc , Gross Chevrolet-Buick-GMC Inc and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2016cv01983
Plaintiff:
Garland E. Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Eric L. Holder, Jacob Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVERIDGE et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00912
Plaintiff:
PERRY LOVERIDGE , NEAL ABRAHAMSON , RANDY ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Williams v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2016cv05500
Plaintiff:
Garland E. Williams
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Eric L. Holder, Carl E. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
