Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Foster v. Lane et al
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Defendant:
Darron Lane, Donald Muniz, Dwight L. Blackshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Foster v. Lumpkin
as 22-40571
Petitioner / Appellant:
Donald Foster
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Foster v. Jackson
as 22-40251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Donald Foster
Defendant / Appellee:
Billy Jackson, Assistant Warden, Jody Vincent, Major, Officer McGala and others
Douglas Stalley v. Lake CI Warden, et al
as 22-10881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. STALLEY, as P.R. of the Estate of Jose Gregory Villegas and obo ZV and DV, minor children of the deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE CI WARDEN, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, an agency of the State of Florida, MILTON GASS, Individually and as Lieutenant for the Lake Correctional Institution and others
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2021cv00105
Petitioner:
Donald Foster
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01666
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foster v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2021cv00042
Petitioner:
Donald Foster
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foster v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Daniel D Dickerson, Mohamed Touhami and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Jackson et al
as 9:2020cv00166
Respondent:
Officer Duff, Jody Vincent, Billy. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
