Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Mitchell v. Secret Service Agent Larry Lamonaco et al
as 3:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Donald Mitchell
Defendant:
Secret Service Agent Larry Lamonaco, Unknown Agent for Jacksonville Sheriff's Office, Duval County Jail Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsel v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00450
Plaintiff:
Franstina Townsel
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Christopher Epps, Margaret Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mitchell v. Seminole County Deputies
as 6:2008cv02121
Plaintiff:
Donald Mitchell
Defendant:
Seminole County Deputies
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parker v. Anderson, et al
as 08-10426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE EVANS PARKER, also known as Clyde Dale Evans, also known as Clyde Dale Evans Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
DEE ANDERSON, Sheriff, Tarrant County, CEDRIC SIMON, Chief, MARY HENDRIX, Captain and others
Tony Winn v. Eva Ely, et al
as 08-35224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY RAY WINN
Defendant - Appellee:
EVA ELY, PHILLIP DAHL, BRIAN WOLFE and others
Mitchell v. Warden, John E. Polk Correctional Facility
as 6:2007cv01862
Petitioner:
Donald Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden, John E. Polk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 6:2007cv01648
Defendant:
Donald Mitchell and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barrett et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2007cv00810
Plaintiff:
David Barrett, David Barrett, David Barrett and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
