Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kenneson v. Parker et al
as 3:2020cv00988
Defendant:
James Daniels, Robert Milslagle and Donald Parker
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Kenneson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Schmidt v. Robert Parker, et al
as 15-1391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. PARKER, Attorney at Law, jointly, severally, CATHOLINE GORTSCH, Attorney at Law, jointly, severally, PARKER AND PARKER, Attorneys at Law, jointly, severally and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Costa et al v. County Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Tyler Costa , Renee Delgado , Stephen Baumann and others
Defendant:
County Sacramento, Vernon Speirs, Don Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Costa et al v. County Sacramento et al
as 2:2012at01511
Plaintiff:
Tyler Costa , Renee Delgado , Stephen Baumann and others
Defendant:
County Sacramento, Vernon Speirs, Don Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Schmidt #779266 v. Parker et al
as 1:2011cv01133
Plaintiff:
James Edward Schmidt #779266
Defendant:
Robert E. Parker, Catholine Gortsch, Parker and Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - None:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
