Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10131
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CHAPMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chapman v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10003
Plaintiff:
Douglas Chapman
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien LTD, Covidien Plc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64607
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman et al v. United States Of America et al
as 3:2019cv00797
Plaintiff:
Susan Chapman and Douglas Chapman
Defendant:
United States Of America and Maria Pavlicka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Web Innovations & Technology Services, Inc. v. Bridges to Digital Excellence et al
as 1:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
Web Innovations & Technology Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Bridges to Digital Excellence , Douglas Chapman , Gilbert J. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Web Innovations & Technology Services, Inc v. Bridges to Digital Excellence et al
as 4:2015cv00934
Plaintiff:
Web Innovations and Technology Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Bridges to Digital Excellence, Douglas Chapman, Gilbert J. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Web Innovations and Technology Services, Inc. v. Bridges to Digital Excellence et al
as 4:2013cv00507
Defendant:
Bridges to Digital Excellence and Douglas Chapman
Plaintiff:
Web Innovations and Technology Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Chapman v. Thaler
as 7:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Douglas Chapman
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2013cv00014
Petitioner:
Kenneth Douglas Chapman
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
