Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
Actavis Holdco US, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Actavis Elizabeth LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Blood Reagents Antitru
as 12-4067
Plaintiff - Appellee:
F BARAGANO PHARMACEUTICALS INC, COMMUNITY MEDICAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, PROFESSIONAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT OF CRENSHAW LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS INC
Defendant - Appellee:
IMMUCOR INC
Campbell v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2012cv03193
Defendant:
Gengony Abbott, Keith C. Allensten, Jr., Lanet S. Asmussen and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL v. IMMUCOR, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03997
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL
Defendant:
IMMUCOR, INC., ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Thompson v. Douglas County Hospital et al
as 1:2007cv01373
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Thompson
Defendant:
Douglas County Hospital, Georgia Healthcare Psychological Division, N W Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Douglas County Hospital et al
as 1:2007mi00166
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Thompson
Defendant:
Douglas County Hospital, Georgia Healthcare Psychological Division, N W Regional Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
