Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dowie v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2026cv00108
Petitioner:
Justin Eugene Dowie
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Dowies
as 26-30256
Plaintiff:
Cedre Moore
Defendant:
Sam Dowies, individually and in his official capacity, Dusty Williams, individually and in her official capacity and Keith Dill, individually and in his official capacity
Dowie v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2026cv00028
Petitioner:
Justin Eugene Dowie
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Willis et al v. Dowies et al
as 5:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
Verdia Willis and Ralph Ridley, Jr
Defendant:
Sam Dowies, Liz Murrill and Danny Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melvin Devost v. Dale Davis, et al
as 25-2615
Plaintiff:
MELVIN DEVOST
Defendant:
DALE DAVIS, JOSHUA DAVIS, MATTHEW DOWIS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01622
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01086
Defendant:
Sam Dowie, James LeBlanc, Bobby Morgan and others
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Glen T Cummings and Evanna A Dowis
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States v. Justin Dowie
as 24-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Justin Eugene Dowie
United States v. Justin Dowie
as 24-1122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Justin Eugene Dowie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
