Cases 1 - 9 of 9
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45463
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DON DOYLE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holli Lundahl v. Doyle Davies, et al
as 19-3654
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Price, Cabinet Secretary to the South Dakota Department of Public Safety, Alex Weiss, South Dakota Prosecutor, Luke Reiner, Wyoming Director of the Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Holli Lundahl
Lundahl v. Davies et al
as 5:2019cv05071
Defendant:
Scott Peasley, Justin Daraie, Susan Elliot and others
Petitioner:
Holli Lundahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Atwood v. Ronald Punch, et al
as 19-20033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RAY ATWOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, MATTHEW K. MCCLAIN, DOYLE DAVIS and others
Atwood v. Punch et al
as 4:2018cv01711
Plaintiff:
David Ray Atwood
Defendant:
Ronald C Punch, Doyle Davis, Matthew K. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Davis et al
as 4:2018cv00531
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Kelly Strong, Brian Smith and others
Petitioner:
Sam Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle-Davis et al v. Tamminga et al
as 4:2015cv00332
Plaintiff:
Carrie Doyle-Davis and Jason Davis
Defendant:
Jordan D. Tamminga and Pekin Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv89158
Plaintiff:
EARNEST DOYLE DAVIS and EARNEST DOYLE DAVIS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Dubose et al v. Morristown Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
Brett R Dubose, Brett R Dubose, Jodie R Philpot and others
Defendant:
Morristown Police Department, Roger Overholt, Jason Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
