Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Robert Garrett, Jr. v. Franklin Richardson
as 21-6239
Defendant:
B. ROBERTS, STEPHON, C. HINDENBURG, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LOUIS GARRETT, JR., a/k/a Chubby, a/k/a Chubb, a/k/a Tru, a/k/a Kweli, a/k/a Justice
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLIN RICHARDSON, MCBRIDE and ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Bugher et al
as 6:2020cv01710
Plaintiff:
Tod James Bailey
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Smith, RN Carmen Lewis, Micki Jarnagin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Diontae J. Duncan v. The California Healthcare Receivership Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Defendant:
Dr. W. Gerderal, III, Dr. Graywall, C. Phifer and others
Plaintiff:
Diontae Johan Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Wound Care Tech Young, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Bannister et al
as 2:2020cv00622
Plaintiff:
Eric Jones
Defendant:
Dr H Landspear, Dr Robert Bannister, Dr T Augustine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Young, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNeal v. Dotson et al
as 1:2020cv01043
Defendant:
FNU Spencer, Dr. T. Robertson, FNU Killingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Myron McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mrs. Young and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
