Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Washington v. City of Las Vegas
as 2:2026cv02041
Plaintiff:
Melvin K. Washington
Defendant:
City of Las Vegas, Dula Community Center Employees, City of Las Vegas Marshal Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Blackledge (Anderson)
as 26-1378
Defendant:
KEYEWANIE BLACKLEDGE, ABDUL ABDULLAH, CLEMENT BOATENG and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Blackledge (Anderson)
as 26-1342
Defendant:
KEYEWANIE BLACKLEDGE, ABDUL ABDULLAH, CLEMENT BOATENG and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Jeremy Dula
as 26-4219
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEREMY DONOVAN DULA, a/k/a Tank, a/k/a Big T
DULA v. LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP, et al.
as 2:2026cv00615
Plaintiff:
Mariam Dula
Defendant:
LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP and PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Dula v. Bean
as 2:2026cv00685
Petitioner:
Bryan David Dula
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dula v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2026cv00071
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dula
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Jiezhong Li v. California Acupuncture Board et al
as 2:2025cv11821
Plaintiff:
Jiezhong Li
Defendant:
California Acupuncture Board, Dongguk University Los Angeles, DULA and Does 1 through 20 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Dula v. Brawley et al
as 8:2025cv02384
Plaintiff:
Marcoust Dula
Defendant:
Destiny Brawley and Charlie M. Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimitrov v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2025cv07420
Plaintiff:
Kalin G. Dimitrov
Defendant:
The United States of America, The City Of New York,, Township of Teaneck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
