Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
North v. Spring Independent School District et al
as 4:2023cv03749
Plaintiff:
Julius Lamunn North
Defendant:
Spring Independent School District, Justine Durant, Winford Adams, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vanderhorst et al v. City of Georgetown et al
as 2:2023cv03594
Plaintiff:
Tony Vanderhorst, Evelyn McCray and Willie Singleton
Defendant:
City of Georgetown, Robert Durant Cox, Ryan J. Call and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
M.B. Hutson
Defendant:
Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hickson v. Durant, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Hickson
Defendant:
Durant, City of, Thomas Billy, Ricky Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Bank of Texas
as 3:2023cv01300
Plaintiff:
Jeral Durant Henderson
Defendant:
Bank of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cash v. City of Durant, et al
as 23-7033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LYNN CASH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DURANT, CHRIS CICIO, TIMOTHY MCEACHERN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
