Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Wilson v. Bertie Co. Sheriff's Dept.
as 5:2026hc02029
Petitioner:
Robert Dwight Wilson
Respondent:
Bertie Co. Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spicer v. Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, et al.
as 1:2025cv02044
Plaintiff:
Cole Spicer
Defendant:
Rappahannock Regional Jail Authority, Rappahanock Area Community Services Board, Kevin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. County of Chowan et al
as 5:2020ct03099
Defendant:
Piper Rachel Ferguson, County of Chowan, Emily Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dwight Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2019hc02077
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety and Kenneth Lassiter
Petitioner:
Robert Dwight Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2017cv11243
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Wilson , Dwight Wilson , K. S., a minor and others
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson et al v. Everbank, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv22264
Plaintiff:
Dwight Wilson , Jesus A. Avelar-Lemus , Jessie Cross and others
Defendant:
Everbank, N.A. , Everhome Mortgage , Assurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. WALKER
as 4:2012cv00240
Plaintiff:
RANDALL DWIGHT WILSON
Defendant:
WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
