Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Smith v. Holder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01553
Plaintiff: Phillippe L Smith
Defendant: E Holder, Jr and A W Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00127
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv02255
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00662
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gamez v. NY AG Cuomo et al
as 1:2010cv03670
Plaintiff: Ricardo Gamez
Defendant: NY AG Cuomo, Patterson, E. Holder et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Holder
as 1:2010cv02889
Petitioner: Horatio Mitchell
Respondent: E. Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. The Attorney General, et al
as 09-1579
Petitioner - Appellant: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Respondent - Appellee: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and E. HOLDER
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05470
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Application for Naturalization
EVANS v. DANIELS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02123
Petitioner: RAYMOND CURTIS EVANS
Respondent: DANIELS, E. HOLDER and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?