Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Vega v. Paramore et al
as 5:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Waiter H. Paramore, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ray v. F.B.O.P
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Ray
Respondent:
F.B.O.P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cross-Blancke
Defendant:
James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv03899
Plaintiff:
Kyle M. Caldwell, Donald C. Finley, Ramzan J. Alli and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Poff, Jeff v. Scullion et al
as 3:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeff Poff
Defendant:
Lt. Scullion, Lt. Lucas Brown, Jacob Cirian and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poff, Jeff v. Hulce et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jeff Poff
Defendant:
Cpt. Hulce, Cpt. Fedie, Mark Kartman and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Somchai Noonsab v. W.T. Brown
as 22-6771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE W. BROWN, MELANIE A. SHEKITA, MICHAEL HOWELL and others
RAY v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07289
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2022cv01351
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Ray
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
JOHNSON v. SCI-PINE GROVE et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
SOLOMON JOHNSON
Respondent:
E. SCI-Pine Grove, E. Ray, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
