Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Shawe v. Consolidated School District of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Winsome E. Shawe
Defendant:
New Britain Consolidated School District and Gina Cavallo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
B. et al v. SHAW et al
as 2:2021cv00578
Defendant:
JESSE LNU and JAMES E. SHAW, SR.
Plaintiff:
R.B. and LINDA B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Glashauckus, et al
as 2:2019cv01063
Defendant:
City of Lovington, Lovington Police Department and Shawn Glashauckus
Plaintiff:
Bobby E Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01007
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Tracey Gilyard v. Randy Benson
as 14-1007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACEY BERNARD GILYARD and TIFFANY ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY BENSON, Individually, RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and E. SHAW, Individually
McLean v. Shelton et al
as 3:2011cv01535
Defendant:
J. Barton, Marshall Buchholz, Superintendant Coursey and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Smith et al
as 4:2011cv02972
Plaintiff:
Henry Pierce
Defendant:
Derrick Sentell Smith, Franklin Delano Brown, Jr, Ernie Grace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Schoen v. Marion County, Florida et al
as 5:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Schoen
Defendant:
Marion County, Florida, Ed Dean, Gary E. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
