Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Brooks v. Topaz Super Carwash et al
as 2:2023cv02060
Plaintiff:
Zalton E Brooks
Defendant:
Topaz Super Carwash and Bruno Bernada, Owners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Guardian Asset Management et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Roney Harris
Defendant:
Guardian Asset Management, Jerry Mavellia, HSBC Bank USA, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Topez Super Car Wash et al
as 2:2022cv01913
Plaintiff:
Zalton E Brooks
Defendant:
Topez Super Car Wash, Bauno and David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harold Stanley, et al v. James Duff, et al
as 22-5044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Harold R. Stanley, Michael Beals Ellis and Robert A. McNeil
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee C. Prymmer, Barry E. Brooks, William B. McGarvin and others
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Duff and Sheryl L. Walter
Brooks v. Governor, NH, State of
as 1:2021cv00610
Plaintiff:
Troy E. Brooks
Defendant:
Governor, NH, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lashley v. Alltin LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
Keontae Lashley
Defendant:
Alltin LLC, James E. Brooks, Kevin Casteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patmon et al v. Tinree LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Louise Patmon, Ricky Patmon and April Griffin
Defendant:
Tinree LLC, James E. Brooks, Kevin Casteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harkins v. Sutter County et al
as 2:2020cv00347
Defendant:
California Forensics Medical Group, Brandon Barnes, Doris Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Harkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. DUFF et al
as 1:2018cv01746
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. MCNEIL, LEE C. PRYMMER, WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN and others
Defendant:
JAMES DUFF and SHERYL WALTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
