Cases 41 - 49 of 49
CLAYTON v. CHIDRENS CHOICE et al
as 2:2009cv05727
Plaintiff:
KIRT W. CLAYTON, BARBARA E. CLAYTON and MARC ANTHONY CLAYTON
Defendant:
CHIDRENS CHOICE, BILL EBERWEIN, KEVIN DOUGHERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. Jones County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
David E Clayton
Defendant:
Jones County Sheriff's Department, Robert N. Reece, Governor, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Clifford Clayton
as 09-31025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFFORD E. CLAYTON
CLAYTON et al v. CHILDREN'S CHOICE, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04695
Plaintiff:
LYNNE CLAYTON, KIRT W. CLAYTON and BARBARA E. CLAYTON
Defendant:
CHILDREN'S CHOICE, INC., BILL EBERWEIN, CAROLYN EBERWEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01870
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Joiner v. Marshall et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00380
Defendant:
Gina M. Savage, Doctor Bates, E. Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv01321
Plaintiff:
Anne E. Clayton, Anne E. Clayton and Anne E. Clayton
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Henry E. Clayton, Sr., et al. v. ACandS, Inc., et al.
as NYE/1:02-CV-01081
Defendant:
ACandS, Inc
Plaintiff:
Henry E. Clayton, Sr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
