Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Gregory Haynes v. Steven Moawad, et al
as 17-17236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY MELVIN HAYNES
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN J. MOAWAD, GREGORY P. DRESSER, ROBERT HENDERSON and others
Donner, et al v. Nicklaus, et al
as 16-4149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E. JEFFREY DONNER and JUDEE M. DONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK NICKLAUS and JACK NICKLAUS GOLF CLUB, LLC
JOHNSON v. I.R.S. et al
as 1:2015cv01311
Petitioner:
HERBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
I.R.S. , L. FOWLER, DEIDRE MORRON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tully v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 3:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Tully
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Cynthia D. Kinser, Court of Appeals of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hurst et al
as 4:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Herbert Johnson
Defendant:
Debra K. Hurst, Kathleen A. Witts, Carol A. Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. John v. Donner
as 8:2013cv00306
Defendant:
MD E. Jeffrey Donner
Plaintiff:
Edward F. St. John
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Donner, et al v. Nicklaus, et al
as 13-4057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
E. JEFFREY DONNER and JUDEE M. DONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK NICKLAUS and JACK NICKLAUS GOLF CLUB, LLC
Davis v. Attorney General of the State of Virginia et al
as 3:2012cv00531
Petitioner:
Ricky Glendall Davis
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Virginia and Donald E. Jeffrey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bishop et al v. Donner et al
as 1:2011cv03193
Plaintiff:
Jami A. Bishop and Daniel M. Bishop
Defendant:
E. Jeffrey Donner, Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
