Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Huspon v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry W Huspon and Terry Huspon
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Charles Dugan, Robert E Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
HUSPON v. CARTER et al
as 2:2021cv00260
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, RICHARD BROWN, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY HUSPON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Transportation Insurance Co
as 6:2021cv01086
Plaintiff:
M.D. Charles E Padgett and Charles E Padgett
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION INS CO and Transportation Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDY v. CARTER et al
as 2:2020cv00233
Defendant:
BRUCE LEMMON, RICHARD BROWN, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HARDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Rhymer et al
as 4:2018cv01451
Plaintiff:
Allen Charron Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Rhymer, Christopher Brently, Robert E. Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Mueller et al
as 8:2012cv01898
Plaintiff:
Joey Lynn Clark
Defendant:
Steve Mueller and Robert E Padgett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padgett v. Washington County Court, 1st Judicial District et al
as 1:2008cv00625
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Padgett
Defendant:
Washington County Court, 1st Judicial District, District Attorney Walker, Ben Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rafsky et al v. Allergan, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv01887
Plaintiff:
Christina Rafsky, Howard Rafsky, Barbara Jane Padgett and others
Defendant:
Allergan, Inc., Allergan, Inc., Inamed Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ervin E. Padgett v. Zurn Industries, Inc.
as PAE/2:08-CV-63677
Plaintiff:
Ervin E. Padgett
Defendant:
Zurn Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
