Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE THE ESTATE OF EUGENE E. SCHMITT, DECEASED v. TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2020cv00035
Plaintiff:
IN RE THE ESTATE OF EUGENE E. SCHMITT, DECEASED
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Schmitt v. CACH,L.L.C. et al
as 8:2019cv00155
Defendant:
CACH,L.L.C. and Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Victor E. Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Devin Andrich v. State Bar of Arizona, et al
as 19-15199
Defendant / Appellee:
APRIL LANDRY, SANDRA L. ETHERTON, trustee, ROSEMARY H. ROSALES, trustee and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00021
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Andrich v. Bales et al
as 2:2018cv03004
Plaintiff:
Devin Andrich
Defendant:
April Landry, Robert E Schmitt, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Contour Mortgage Corporation et al v. Bachmann et al
as 2:2017cv01286
Defendant:
Laurence R. Bachmann, District Court of Nassau County, Nassau County Department of Social Services and others
Plaintiff:
Contour Mortgage Corporation
Movant:
Samuele Mastropieri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Schmitt v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00366
Plaintiff:
Chad E Schmitt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00310
Defendant:
BALLARD, BOOKER, BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Archer Capital Fund, LP v. TKW Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv02747
Plaintiff:
Archer Capital Fund, LP
Defendant:
TKW Partners, LLC , Joan F. Hammer , Glen H. Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
