Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Clervrain v. Haget et al
as 2:2022cv02225
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Tre Haget, Christopher Erlewine, John E. Hyten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITEHEAD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2021cv00245
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE E WHITEHEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coleman v. Inch et al
as 3:2019cv00319
Defendant:
B. Roberts, K.N. Box, Felicia D. Chestnut and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Whitehead v. BBVA Compass Bank, et al
as 19-11821
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
BBVA COMPASS BANK and JAMES C. PUCKETT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM H. WHITEHEAD, as power of attorney for Lewis E. Whitehead, Jr. pursuant to a power of attorney signed by William E. Whitehead, Jr.
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Douglas, Brandon S. Lowery, D. Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitehead v. Cook County Department Of Corrections
as 1:2017cv02112
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Whitehead
Defendant:
Cook County Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Crews et al
as 3:2016cv01004
Plaintiff:
Shaw V. Coleman
Defendant:
Michael D. Crews, Julie L. Jones, Corizon Health Care Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Palmer et al
as 3:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Markiece Jackson
Defendant:
John Palmer, Julie Jones, Eric Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Whitehead v. United State
as 14-2900
Petitioner:
James E. Whitehead
Respondent:
United States of America
Whitehead et al. v. Ethicon, Inc. et al.
as 2:2014cv22201
Plaintiff:
Rebecca E. Whitehead and Shane Whitehead
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
