Cases 31 - 40 of 43
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2009cv00764
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Pelican Bay State Prison
as 5:2004cv02621
Plaintiff:
Todd D. Pickens
Defendant:
R. Jacobs, Richard Kirkland, Earl Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christy McGowan v. Earl Boek, et al
as 09-16490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTY MCGOWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EARL ALLEN BOEK, individually and partner, ANDERSON COTTONWOOD ACQUISITIONS, L.L.C., MONTY A. BARNARD, individually and partner and others
Allen v. O' Brien et al
as 7:2009cv00208
Petitioner:
Richard Earl Allen
Respondent:
Terry O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Earl Allen v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84741
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Earl Allen
Allen v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
as 6:2008cv01047
Petitioner:
Earl Allen
Respondent:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2008cv84741
Plaintiff:
EARL ALLEN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLEN v. CHAMBERLAIN et al
as 2:2008cv02772
Petitioner:
WALTER EARL ALLEN, 2ND
Respondent:
DAWN CHAMBERLAIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-5320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
