Cases 21 - 30 of 1,013
Ackerson v. Pfeiffer et al
as 4:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Darren L. Ackerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mark Pfeiffer, Randy P Lukasek, Dylan Mitchem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff, Wayne Dicky
as 5:2023cv01530
Petitioner:
Earnest Key Johnson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCormick v. Horn et al
as 7:2023cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Mack Earnest Horn and Deputy Hagy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02208
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
BROWN, EARNEST, JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons Jr. v. St. Louis City Justice Center et al
as 4:2023cv01572
Plaintiff:
Earnest T. Lyons Jr.
Defendant:
St. Louis City Justice Center, Jennifer Abdullah-Clemons and Tammy Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINOR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
JAMAR KENNETH MINOR
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, C. CONYERS, J. EARNEST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCay v. Sipes et al
as 5:2023cv01102
Defendant:
B Sipes, Braniy, Ms Lt. Earnest and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie McCay, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv01064
Petitioner:
Lee Earnest Price, III
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Earnest v. USA
as 3:2023cv00320
Petitioner:
William Earnest
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
