Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cardiff v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Riverside
as 26-2849
Petitioner:
JASON EDWARD THOMAS CARDIFF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smithey Law Group LLC v. Wertz et al
as 1:2026cv01551
Plaintiff:
Smithey Law Group LLC
Defendant:
Amanda Wertz, Edward Thomas Brodmerkel and Marie Brodmerkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smithey Law Group LLC v. Wertz et al
as 1:2026cv01552
Plaintiff:
Smithey Law Group LLC
Defendant:
Amanda Wertz, Edward Thomas Brodmerkel and Marie Brodmerkel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trustees of Dennis Pines Condominium Trust of Denn v. Patten, et al
as 26-1249
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF DENNIS PINES CONDOMINIUM TRUST OF DENNIS
Defendant:
DARLENE K. PATTEN, CITIZENS BANK, N.A., f/k/a RBS Citizens, N.A., UNITED STATES and others
Thomas v. Stitt, et al
as 25-6158
Plaintiff:
DWAIN EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
KEVIN STITT, STEVEN BICKLEY, T. HASTINGS SIEGFRIED and others
Amicus Curiae:
CAMPAIGN FOR THE FAIR SENTENCING OF YOUTH and FORTY-ONE DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE SCHOLARS AND NONPROFITS
United States of America v. Jason Edward Thomas Cardiff
as 2:2025cv08621
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Edward Thomas Cardiff
Interested Party:
Brian Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Thomas v. Lyles et al
as 5:2025cv01351
Petitioner:
Clarence Edward Thomas
Defendant:
Deputy Johnson and Sgt Lyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
