Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Jennings v. EEOC et al
as 5:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jennings
Defendant:
EEOC, Fayetteville Police Department, Springdale Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Agakpe v. Sims et al
as 4:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Prosper Atsu Agakpe
Defendant:
Edmond Sims and EEOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv06090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yohn v. EEOC St. Louis Office et al
as 4:2019cv00433
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, EEOC St. Louis Office and Judge Kendra Howard
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Yohn
Interested Party:
US Senator Kamala Harris and US Senator Claire McCaskill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv04046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
