Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Scott v. Edwards et al
as 8:2017cv03800
Defendant:
Michael Edwards and EG Systems
Plaintiff:
Rameaun Lamont Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arango v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 7:2017cv07174
Plaintiff:
Andres Arango
Defendant:
The Scotts Company LLC and EG Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bates v. The Scotts Company, et al
as 3:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bates
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC and EG Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamsher v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04206
Plaintiff:
Geramie Hamsher
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC and EG Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Shedron v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv61056
Plaintiff:
Matthew Shedron
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC , EG Systems, Inc. and Scotts Miracle-Gro Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shedron v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv10705
Plaintiff:
Matthew Shedron
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC, EG Systems, Inc. and Scotts Miracle-Gro Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Lucas v. The Scotts Company of Ohio, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00813
Plaintiff:
Jeff Lucas
Defendant:
The Scotts Company of Ohio, LLC and EG Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vasquez et al v. The Scotts Company, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv60344
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Vasquez and Antonio Ervin
Defendant:
The Scotts Company, LLC , EG Systems, Inc. , Trugreen, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miceli et al v. EG Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12498
Defendant:
EG Systems, Inc. , James Gimeson , Mike Goodrich and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Miceli , Christopher Pike , Robert Sudbey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
