Cases 1 - 10 of 4,660
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-13773
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Strole v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 3:2024cv08210
Plaintiff:
Sherri Strole
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ernest Swinson v. EEOC
as 24-3267
Plaintiff:
Ernest Antoine Swinson
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chhim v. City of Houston
as 24-20469
Defendant:
City of Houston, Human Resources-Public Works, Rayford O. Irvin, Michael Lightner and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chhim
Dr. James Dobson Family Institute et al v. Becerra et al
as 4:2024cv00986
Defendant:
Chair Charlotte Burrows, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES;, Secretary Xavier Becerra and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. James Dobson Family Institute and USATransForm
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
The Stanley M. Herzog Foundation v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 4:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
The Stanley M. Herzog Foundation
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Charlotte Burrows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
