Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Johnson v. English et al
as 3:2026cv00483
Plaintiff:
Theodore T Johnson and Theodore Johnson
Defendant:
B English, C Ertle, N Angle and others
Unknown:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ertl v. Fulton Bank, N.A.
as 3:2026cv00011
Plaintiff:
John Ertl
Defendant:
Fulton Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Munnerlyn v. Locklear
as 4:2025cv14031
Plaintiff:
Candice Munnerlyn
Defendant:
Vance Ertle Locklear, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
Wilson v. Locklear
as 4:2025cv14024
Plaintiff:
Dyvion Wilson
Defendant:
Vance Ertle Locklear, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
Ertle v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv02957
Plaintiff:
Terri Ertle
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Ertle v. AngioDynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv02951
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Ertle
Defendant:
AngioDynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Ertl v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. et al
as 0:2025cv03958
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Ertl
Defendant:
Delta Air Lines, Inc. and Endeavor Air, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Ertl v. Bisignano
as 0:2025cv03862
Plaintiff:
Randy Ertl
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TRUMBETTI v. THE BROUGH OF BELLMAWR et al
as 1:2025cv03265
Plaintiff:
Frank Trumbetti
Defendant:
Raymond Bider, James Burleigh, Michael Draham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pretrial Service:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
