Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ali v. Tatum et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Esker Lee Tatum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Tatum et al
as 3:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Esker Lee Tatum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. TATUM et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
JOHN CARTER
Defendant:
ESKER LEE TATUM, The GEO Group and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Neilson Fletcher v. USA, et al
as 17-17090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEILSON DAIN FLETCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ESKER LEE TATUM, Jr. and others
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 17-1292
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE GONYEA, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Ray Brook, f/k/a FNU Gaunyea, FNU KUZNECOW, (first name unknown) Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, K. LEWIS, Physician's Assistant, FCI Berlin and others
Defendant - Appellee:
E. L. TATUM, Warden, FCI Berlin, a/k/a Esker Lee Tatum, DAN SULLIVAN, Case Management Coordinator, FCI Berlin, WANDA MULLINS, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Gorak v. Tatum et al
as 2:2014cv01411
Petitioner:
Gregory Sean Gorak
Respondent:
Esker Lee Tatum and Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
