Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Raphael Mendez v. Susan Richard Nelson
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raphael Mendez
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Susan Richard Nelson, et al
Jomo v. Kallis
as 0:2021cv02266
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Jomo
Defendant:
Steve Kallis, Rochester Federal Medical Center Et. Al. and United States Federal Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Davidson v. Mark Stringer, et al
as 21-2298
Defendant / Appellee:
Denise Hacker, F.S.H., et al and Mark Stringer, Director of MO Dept of Mental Health, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Simpson v. Stafford #887, et al
as 1:2020cv00276
Plaintiff:
Preston W. Simpson
Defendant:
Stafford #887, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaso v. Dawson County Sherriffs et al et al
as 4:2019cv03106
Defendant:
Dawson County Sherriffs et al, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Area, Dawson County Sherriffs Off. Schlemat and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Jaso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. State of Nebraska et. al.
as 8:2019cv00360
Defendant:
State of Nebraska et. al., Quinn Robert Eaton, Ms. Marnie Jensen and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner and Mr. Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedington v. Office of Inspector General et al
as 0:2018cv02694
Defendant:
SOS Hansen, FMC Rochester et. al., Office of Internal Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin S. Wedington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed-El v. MODOC et al
as 4:2018cv00641
Plaintiff:
Larry Reed-El
Defendant:
MODOC et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fly v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Smith v. A Construction Company, et al
as 16-4312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan D. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
A Construction Company, et al, State of Missouri, City of St. Louis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
