Cases 1 - 10 of 23
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23888
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA EUGENE ELLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00828
Defendant:
Oliver Ellis, City of Monroe, Friday Ellis and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Mallory Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
Reginald Brown and Latoya Brown
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Oliver Ellis, Eugene Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Zordan et al
as 3:2021cv01061
Defendant:
Eugene Ellis, City of Monroe, Victor Zordan and others
Petitioner:
Mr. Timothy Wayne Williams
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cole Alan Chase et al v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers al
as 2:2020cv08841
Plaintiff:
Joseph Matthew Rachunok, Michael Combs, Shawn Lee Sherman and others
Defendant:
IAM TWU Association, John and Janes Does, Transport Workers Union of America AFL CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellis v. Williams
as 4:2020cv00098
Petitioner:
Eugene Ellis
Respondent:
Doug Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06102
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ELLIS v. BLOOMINGTON PROSECUTOR OFFICE et al
as 1:2018cv00573
Defendant:
BLOOMINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BLOOMINGTON PROSECUTOR OFFICE and MONROE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Plaintiff:
EUGENE ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
