Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ewell v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
as 1:2026cv27743
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Belinda Mitchell Ewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ewell v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
as 1:2026cv27746
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Belinda Mitchell Ewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ewell v. LOreal USA, Inc., et al
as 1:2026cv13390
Defendant:
Avlon Industries, MCBride Research Laboratories, Inc., House of Cheatham LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ewell v. Tilley et al
as 5:2026ct03242
Plaintiff:
James Earl Ewell
Defendant:
Jennifer Tilley, Tara Wilson and Nurse Marish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Ewell et al
as 4:2026cv00039
Plaintiff:
Terry Ashley
Defendant:
Gerald Ewell, Greg Perry and Craig Northcott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In the Matter of the Complaint of John J. Housey, Jr.
as 2:2026cv01430
Petitioner:
John J Housey, Jr
Claimant:
Karter Cerise Potts and Ewell Cardwell Potts
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 30504 Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Potts et al v. Housey, Jr. et al
as 2:2026cv01406
Plaintiff:
Karter Cerise Potts and Ewell Cardwell Potts, III
Defendant:
Reed Menszer, Harrison Menszer, Progressive Security Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Mercier v. Ewell et al
as 2:2026cv12215
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Mercier
Defendant:
Edward Ewell, Jr and Wayne County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anthony EwellIn re: Anthony Ewell
as 26-12041
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY SHAWNN EWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ewell v. City of Fort Lauderdale et al
as 0:2026cv61659
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shawnn Ewell
Defendant:
City of Fort Lauderdale, Alexander Paul, Robert Rausch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
