Cases 1 - 10 of 58
(PC) Stevens v. Eyster et al
as 5:2025cv02439
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
C. David Eyster, Anthony Delapo, Chris Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevens v. Eyster et al
as 2:2025cv00713
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
C. David Eyster, Anthony Delapo, Chris Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Aaren, et al.
as 24-6359
Defendant:
CITY OF MENDOCINO, Deputy BRAD JAMES, Deputy, JILL RAVITCH and others
Plaintiff:
DEAN MICHAEL STEVENS
Eyster et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 5:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Laura M Eyster, Laura M Grisso and Craig Adam Eyster
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Giusti v. Eyster et al
as 3:2022cv03426
Petitioner:
David Charles Giusti
Respondent:
C. David Eyster and Keith Faulder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
David Giusti v. C. David Eyster, et al
as 22-70103
Petitioner:
DAVID C. GIUSTI
Respondent:
C. DAVID EYSTER, District Attorney and KEITH FAULDER, Judge
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Rhoades et al Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
as 1:2021cv03391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Phillip Rhoades, Joseph Franklin Dennis, Joshua Marshall Floyd and others
Defendant:
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stevens v. Aaren et al
as 5:2021cv05531
Plaintiff:
Dean Michael Stevens
Defendant:
Jeffry Aaren, Mary LeClarr, City of Mendocino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicodemus v. Noonan et al
as 3:2020cv00726
Defendant:
Eugene Eyster, City of South Bend and Steven Noonan
Plaintiff:
Donald Nicodemus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
