Cases 1 - 10 of 16
United States v. Griffin
as 22-6126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DONTE EARL GRIFFIN
Griffin v. Rutledge
as 4:2021cv00480
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Plaintiff:
Earl Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Grady County Jail Staff et al
as 5:2020cv01254
Plaintiff:
Donte Earl Griffin
Defendant:
Grady County Jail Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sainvil et al v. Stellar Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01193
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sainvil , Denise Penn , Harry Damerow and others
Defendant:
Stellar Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACS Recovery Services, Inc., et al v. Larry Griffin, et al
as 11-40446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ACS RECOVERY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and FKI INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY GRIFFIN and WILLIE EARL GRIFFIN
Griffin v. Trowbridge et al
as 3:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Leonard Earl Griffin
Defendant:
Toby Trowbridge, Jr., Brian Watson, Mary Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
as 3:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
D. L. Bennett, Clemmie Bilbro, Earl Bradford and others
Defendant:
Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ACS Recovery Services, Inc. et al v. Griffin et al
as 6:2009cv00512
Plaintiff:
ACS Recovery Services, Inc. and FKI Industries, Inc
Defendant:
Larry Griffin, Willie Earl Griffin and Larry Griffin Special Needs Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Warren v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2009cv00472
Plaintiff:
Gary Warren
Defendant:
Amadeo Ortiz, Roger Dovolina, Earl Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derouen V. Hopes, et al.
as 5:2009cv00366
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Derouen
Defendant:
C. Hopes, FNU Gonzalez, Patrick Skillman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
