Cases 11 - 20 of 20
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Various John Does et al
as 3:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Nicholas Daley, Edwin Cooper, Sam Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Holmes v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl Holmes, Sr.
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Dawn McFarland, IMCC Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Holmes v. Ronald King
as 11-60647
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES EARL HOLMES
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD KING
Holmes v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00324
Petitioner:
James Earl Holmes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holmes v. King et al
as 1:2010cv00151
Petitioner:
James Earl Holmes
Respondent:
Ronald King and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-6210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vacek v. Judicial Standards Commission, et al
as 09-2226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN VACEK
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL STANDARDS COMMISSION, DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT, an administrative division of limited jurisdiction within the Second Judicial District Court, COURT OF APPEALS and others
Sadler et al v. International Paper Company
as 3:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Donald Sadler, Bessie Sadler, Carol Jones and others
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vacek v. Judicial Standards Commission of New Mexico et al
as 1:2008cv01210
Plaintiff:
Dan L Vacek
Defendant:
Judicial Standards Commission of New Mexico, DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT, Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holmes v. Gwin
as 4:2008cv00199
Plaintiff:
Earl Holmes, III
Defendant:
Sharon P Gwin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
