Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. The Secretary of the Navy, et al
as 2:2019cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barby Earl Wilson
Defendant:
The Navy Chief of Chaplains, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Secretary of the Navy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lancaster et al v. Secretary of the Navy et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dufour, Andrew Calhoun, Timothy Demy and others
Defendant:
The Secretary of the Navy, The Chief of Naval Personnel and The Navy Chief of Chaplains
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. Warden O'Brien
as 3:2013cv00174
Petitioner:
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard Wilson, Jr. v. Thoma
as 12-8053
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS
Wilson v. Thomas
as 2:2012cv00540
Petitioner:
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02714
Plaintiff:
Katherine Mary Wilson and Stephen Earl Wilson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and John Doe Corporations 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Richard Wilson, Jr.
as 12-6174
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson
Diebold v. Wilson et al
as 8:2009cv02938
Plaintiff:
Michael Diebold
Defendant:
Herbert Earl Wilson and Con-way Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Richard Wilson, Jr.
as 09-6107
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson
Swann v. City of Richmond
as 07-1981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE SWANN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RICHMOND, The, JAMES EARL WILSON, Officer, In his individual capacity, KEVIN PAUL HATHAWAY, Officer, In his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
