Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. as Successor in Interest to Eastbay Inc. v. John Cardenas, Texas Sports & Entertainment LLC and Showcase Athletics PLLC
as 5:2021cv00564
Plaintiff:
Eastbay, Inc. and Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
John R. Cardenas, Texas Sports & Entertainment LLC and Showcase Athletics PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
BSN Sports, LLC v. Hinote et al
as 8:2019cv01480
Defendant:
RHANDA HINOTE, KEITHA HALL, Foot Locker, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
BSN Sports, LLC
Semler v. Eastbay, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv03220
Defendant:
Unknown Jane and John Does at the Minnesota Sex Offender Program Moose Lake and Eastbay, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hadar Manufacturing, Inc. v. Eastbay Inc
as 4:2014cv00494
Plaintiff:
Hadar Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Eastbay Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hat World Inc. v. Eastbay Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01656
Defendant:
Eastbay Inc. and Mark Holmes
Plaintiff:
Hat World Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hat World Inc. v. Eastbay Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv01655
Defendant:
Eastbay Inc. and Mark Holmes
Plaintiff:
Hat World Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Princeton Digital Image Corporation v. Footlocker.com Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00517
Plaintiff:
Princeton Digital Image Corporation
Defendant:
Footlocker.com Inc. and Eastbay Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
