Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Westfield Insurance Company v. Gadson et al
as 1:2025cv01985
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Althea Leslie Gadson, Kelvin Kenard Slaton, Ed Smith Construction Company, Inc. and others
Counter-Claimant:
Althea Leslie Gadson and Kathy Jane Murphy
Counter-Defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Velasquez v. Tafoya Lucero et al
as 2:2024cv01162
Defendant:
Leanne Fudor, Wence Asonganyi, Ed Smith and others
Plaintiff:
August Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Errington
as 1:2019cv00289
Plaintiff:
Willie Ed Smith
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leonard N. Anderson v. Ed Smith, et al
as 19-1959
Defendant / Appellee:
City of St. Paul, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Ed Smith, in his individual capacity and his official capacity for his conduct under color of law, in the course and scope of his employment, as a City of St. Paul, Department of Safety Inspections Employee
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leonard N. Anderson
Kraemer v. Edelstein et al
as 1:2018cv09804
Defendant:
Amy (Fontno) DeRaymond, Lisa Spitale, Zenana Fontno and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kraemer
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Chief Mark DiLuzio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 0:2018cv01885
Plaintiff:
Leonard N. Anderson
Defendant:
Ed Smith and St. Paul, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE INC. v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv04396
Plaintiff:
LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE INC.
Defendant:
ED SMITH and DOROTHY BRENNAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE v. SMITH
as 1:2017cv06768
Plaintiff:
LONG AND FOSTER REAL ESTATE
Defendant:
ED SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Judges
as 3:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ed Smith
Defendant:
Judges
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
