Cases 1 - 10 of 2,118
Perez v. Edge Fitness Clubs
as 1:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Natalia Perez
Defendant:
Edge Fitness Clubs
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BROWN v. EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
J.P. NOYES EDGE and T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spoo v. IBP Asset, LLC
as 1:2024cv03460
Defendant:
IBP Asset, LLC doing business as Cutting Edge Glass
Plaintiff:
Laurence Spoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Employment
Robert Pickle, et al v. MN Association of Townships, et al
as 24-3480
Defendant:
Heather E. Tidmore, Minnesota Association of Townships, Wayne S. Thom and others
Plaintiff:
Randal H. Gorder, Robert J. Pickle and Aaron A. Werpy
Lane et al v. Federal Emergency Management Agency et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Richard S. Werth, Ruben Baca, Kelly Powell and others
Defendant:
Does 1-20, inclusive and Federal Emergency Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Collective Edge, LLC v. US
as 25-1224
Plaintiff:
FERG'S SPORTS BAR & GRILL, INC., COLLEEN A. LOPEZ, COLLECTIVE EDGE, LLC and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Edge v. United States of America et al
as 7:2024cv01086
Defendant:
United States of America, Robin Kelleher, Oak Island Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Nigel Max Edge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Edge Systems LLC v. Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC
as 25-1190
Plaintiff:
EDGE SYSTEMS LLC
Defendant:
CARTESSA AESTHETICS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
