Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
White v. J.A.W. Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv21260
Plaintiff:
Erica White
Defendant:
J.A.W. Entertainment, Inc., Joseph Long, Michael Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
LOPEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02266
Plaintiff:
EDMUNDO LOPEZ, SR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: New York City Board of
as 21-740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edmundo Lopez
Plaintiff:
Mayling Ralph, Elsa Gulino, Peter Wilds and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York
Defendant:
New York State Education Department
Lopez-Escamilla v. USA
as 4:2019cv00568
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Edmundo Lopez-Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tadeo et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018cv00436
Defendant:
Clayton Merson, Unknown Parties, Roosevelt McKnight and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea Tadeo and Abran Ramon Tadeo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Edmundo Lopez-Escamilla
as 17-40843
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDMUNDO LOPEZ-ESCAMILLA, also known as Mundo
Lopez et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv31174
Plaintiff:
Maria Lopez and Edmundo Lopez, Jr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Sergio Lopez-Cordero
as 11-40540
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SERGIO EDMUNDO LOPEZ-CORDERO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
