Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Gomez et al v. Amaral et al
as 3:2012cv04646
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gomez , Alfredo Figueroa and Marv Amaral
Defendant:
Burt Amaral and Steve Amaral
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Guipson v. Detective Ann Guerin et al
as 1:2012cv03807
Plaintiff:
Noel Guipson
Defendant:
Detective Ann Guerin, Eduardo Gomez and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ v. LEWIS
as 1:2012cv00116
Petitioner:
EDUARDO GOMEZ
Respondent:
ROBERT LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cruz-Vazquez, et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, In, et al
as 11-2297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZEL I. CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, RAUL A. CRUZ-RIVERA, LUCY I. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., BRENDA M. TORRES-PEREZ, EDUARDO GOMEZ-TORRES and others
Eduardo Gomez Ruiz v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70466
Petitioner:
EDUARDO GOMEZ RUIZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Gomez v. Pollard et al
as 5:2010cv00327
Defendant:
Howard Bennett, William McCrae, Velencia Pollard and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Eduardo Sanchez-Calderon
as 10-50136
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO SANCHEZ-CALDERON, AKA Eduardo Sanchez Calderon, AKA Ricardo Sanchez, AKA Ricardo Lopez, AKA Rick Gomez, AKA Eduardo Gomez, AKA Ricardo Gomez Lopez
Cruz-Vazquez, et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, In, et al
as 09-1758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZEL I. CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, RAUL A. CRUZ-RIVERA, LUCY I. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., BRENDA M. TORRES-PEREZ, EDUARDO GOMEZ-TORRES and others
Defendant:
MINERVA DIAZ-ARISTUD
Marrero et al v. Logisticare Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv20561
Plaintiff:
Roberto Marrero, Eduardo Gomez, Roberto Ricardo and others
Defendant:
Logisticare Solutions, LLC and Red Top Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
