Cases 1 - 10 of 398
White v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Killian White
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office, Tyler Hunt, Jeffrey Petrenchak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyne et al v. CKR Law LLP et al
as 1:2024cv02912
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keith E. Pyne and Enrico Desiata
Defendant:
CKR Law LLP and Jeffrey Rinde
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Urve MaggittiIn re: Urve Maggitti
as 24-1660
Petitioner:
In re: URVE MAGGITTI
Respondent:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Rhodes, III v. Wellpath et al.
as 4:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
EnRico T Rhodes, III
Defendant:
Wellpath, Commissioner D. Ditzler, Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Maxwell & Morgan P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
TL Harvey
Defendant:
Maxwell & Morgan P.C., Jeffrey B Corben, W William Nikolaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
White v. King County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Killian White
Defendant:
King County Sheriff's Office, Tyler Hunt, Jeffrey Petrenchak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Thomas Enrico DeFelice v. Trent Allen
as 2:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
Thomas Enrico DeFelice
Respondent:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scotto v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Enrico Scotto
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
