Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,525
Freeman (PS) v. Epps et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff: Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant: Elizabeth (I) Epps, Elizabeth Epps and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7065
Plaintiff: Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant: District of Columbia Board of Elections
WHITEHEAD v. T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: LILLIAN MARIE WHITEHEAD
Defendant: T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC and CHRISTIAN EPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Epps v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv00175
Plaintiff: Devante Epps
Defendant: Roderick Brown, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Epps v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Marie Epps
Defendant: The Kroger Co., ABC Corporations and John/Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Dennis Epps
as 24-1350
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DENNIS CLIFTON EPPS
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7050
Plaintiff: Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant: District of Columbia Board of Elections
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1173
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00057
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Hoipkemier et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00600
Plaintiff: Adam Hoipkemier and Kevin Epps
Defendant: Duane V. Miller, Eric Macleod, Oak Ridge Project Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?