Cases 1 - 10 of 83
James v. E Baton Rouge City Prsh
as 24-30318
Defendant:
J. Geen, Tanner Jenkins, K-9 Datoka and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James, real party in interest Conner A. James
Harp v. Quality Correctional Care LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Quality Correctional Care LLC, Allen County Sheriff, Quality Correctional LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Eric David Harp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Kijakazi
as 6:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
Eric David Austin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
David v. American National Property & Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
Eric David
Defendant:
American National Property & Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WILDMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01616
Plaintiff:
ERIC DAVID WILDMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Marrufo
as 23-1606
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC DAVID MARRUFO
Mills v. City of Palo Alto et al
as 4:2023cv03330
Plaintiff:
Eric David Mills
Defendant:
City of Palo Alto, Officer E. Gonzales, Officer Daniel Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. East Baton Rouge City Parish et al
as 3:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Michael A. James and Conner A. James
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge City Parish, Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Joshua Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Root v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Eric David Root
Defendant:
Mr Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bair v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Eric David Bair
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.