Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Momence Packing Co
as 2:2024cv02031
Plaintiff:
Erick Johnson
Defendant:
Momence Packing Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
JOHNSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19155
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF CECELIA MARGARET JOHNSON and ERICK JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christenson v. Johnson
as 1:2019cv10429
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Christenson
Defendant:
Erick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christenson v. Johnson
as 1:2019cv09625
Plaintiff:
Mark C. Christenson
Defendant:
Erick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matice v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Leroy Ingram, Amanda Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Dean Matice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01381
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Patrick Craig, John Doe Police Officers 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Erick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv08250
Plaintiff:
Jana S. Johnson and Erick Johnson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-35604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Hashemi et al
as 2:2010cv00025
Petitioner:
Leroy Williams
Respondent:
Aliya Hashemi, Michael Williams, Chris Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
