Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Aros #95001 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02565
Defendant:
Unknown Harris, Unknown Cardenas, Unknown Velasco and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Roberto Aros
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West et al v. Brewer et al
as 2:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Thomas Paul West, Gregory Dickens, Charles M Hedlund and others
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer, Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gawlik v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2012cv01946
Plaintiff:
Brian Gawlik
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Annis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roop v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00270
Plaintiff:
Charles H Roop
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo, Jeffrey Freeland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nordstrom v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02344
Plaintiff:
Scott Douglas Nordstrom
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo, A Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02196
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Owens
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan , Ernest Trujillo , Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Trujillo et al
as 4:2011cv00660
Petitioner:
Daniel Merced Flores
Defendant:
Ernest Trujillo and Thomas C Horne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01456
Plaintiff:
James R Burson, Jr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Ernest Trujillo and Jeffrey Freeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beaty v. Brewer, et al
as 2:2011cv01037
Plaintiff:
Donald Beaty
Defendant:
Janice K Brewer , Charles L Ryan , Ernest Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sansing v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv01035
Petitioner:
John Edward Sansing
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Ernest Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
