Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Griffin v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02191
Plaintiff: Eugene Griffin
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp, Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Carl Griffin
as 14-13068
Petitioner: In re: CARL EUGENE GRIFFIN
Mandamus Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carl Griffin v. FCC Coleman - Medium Warden
as 13-15440
Petitioner - Appellant: CARL EUGENE GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee: FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN
In re:Donald Griffin, Jr.
as 13-301
Movant: In re: DONALD EUGENE GRIFFIN, JR.
:
Griffin v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01657
Petitioner: Scott Eugene Griffin
Respondent: John E. Wetzel, Laurel Harry and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Griffin v. McCall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2013cv00554
Petitioner: Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr
Respondent: Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Carl Griffin
as 12-15505
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CARL EUGENE GRIFFIN
Griffin v. Cureton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00717
Plaintiff: Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr
Defendant: Jasper W Cureton, Jr and V Claire Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00462
Petitioner: Virgil Eugene Griffin
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv02136
Plaintiff: Donald Eugene Griffin, Jr
Defendant: South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services and Samuel B Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?