Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Wilson v. Shaw We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03975
Plaintiff: Michael Eugene Wilson, Jr.
Defendant: Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv11326
Plaintiff: COREY EUGENE WILSON
Defendant: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius USA Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parratt v. Magee-Mahon Cafe, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01352
Plaintiff: Suzanne Parratt and Mindy Moore
Defendant: Magee-Mahon Cafe, Inc , John Mahon , Eugene Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00420
Plaintiff: Steen Wilson and Eugene Wilson
Defendant: Novo Nordisk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Quintana We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00061
Petitioner: Harold Eugene Wilson
Respondent: Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Wilson v. City of Dayton, et al
as 14-3039
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT EUGENE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF DAYTON, CITY OF DAYTON OH POLICE, T P ZIMMER and others
Wilson v. City of Dayton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00388
Plaintiff: Robert Eugene Wilson
Defendant: City of Dayton, City of Dayton Oh Police, T P Zimmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wilson v United States of America
as 5:2013cv00445
Petitioner: Donald Eugene Wilson, Jr.
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Donald Wilson, Jr.
as 13-13490
Petitioner: In re: DONALD EUGENE WILSON, JR.
Successive Habeas Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Wilson v. Rebeau et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff: Eugene Wilson
Defendant: Amy Rebeau, Goose Creek Health Care, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?