Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Corey Lea v. First Bank, et al
as 23-5468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST BANK and LARRY F. HINTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Langford v. Hinton et al
as 1:2016cv02092
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Langford
Defendant:
F. Hinton, D. Hanson, Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Hinton
as 3:2015cv03948
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Veronica F Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hough v. Betty Johnson et al
as 8:2015cv00842
Plaintiff:
Andre Hough
Defendant:
Betty Johnson, S. Young, C. Peay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pekin Insurance Company v. The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Pekin Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. , Marsha R. Hinton and Thomas F. Hinton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Hinton et al v. C & S Global Imports, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Marsha R. Hinton and Thomas F. Hinton
Defendant:
C & S Global Imports, Inc., Hunter's View, Ltd., The Sportsman's Guide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gills v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2010cv08029
Plaintiff:
Jaryan J Gills
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
