Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Daniels v. Farris
as 5:2026cv02505
Petitioner:
Norman Patrick Daniels, Jr
Respondent:
Justin Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Grady County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2026cv02500
Plaintiff:
Tamond Thomas
Defendant:
Grady County Criminal Justice Authority, FNU Farris, FNU Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haase v. Rivas-Molloy
as 26-20510
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Haase
Defendant:
Honorable Veronica Rivas-Molloy, Honorable Ricard Hightower, Honorable Maggie Perez-Jaramillo and others
Debtor:
Honorable April Farris
Pink v. Harpe, et al
as 26-7060
Plaintiff:
LO'RE PINK, AKA Johnny L. Hardeman
Defendant:
STEVEN HARPE, ELIZABETH SCHLUTER, R. GULBERT and others
Farris v. Warren
as 4:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
Billy Don Farris, II
Defendant:
Darrell Warren, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farris v. Waughen
as 3:2026cv00113
Petitioner:
Garlin Raymond Farris
Respondent:
D. Waughen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Polston v. Farris
as 5:2026cv02265
Plaintiff:
Sara Polston
Defendant:
Justin Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARRIS v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv05988
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE FARRIS
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shepard v. Farris et al
as 1:2026cv02732
Plaintiff:
Dr. Joseph Shepard
Defendant:
Jeremy Farris and State Ethics Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ezell v. Farris et al
as 5:2026cv02172
Petitioner:
James Ezell, III
Respondent:
Justin Farris, James Nall and Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
